top of page

De Facto Partner Visa 12-Month Rule Australia 2026: When the Rule Applies

5 days ago
2 min read

A common Partner visa issue is whether a de facto couple has been in the relationship long enough before lodgement. Home Affairs guidance for the subclass 820 pathway states that de facto applicants should provide evidence that they have been in the de facto relationship for at least 12 months before applying, unless an alternative basis applies.


Twelve months means more than knowing each other for a year

The relevant question is the duration of the de facto relationship, not simply when the couple met or began dating. Evidence should show when the relationship acquired the characteristics of a de facto partnership.


Registered relationships

Home Affairs states that a registered relationship under an Australian State or Territory relationship-registration scheme can affect the ordinary 12-month requirement. Registration does not remove the need to prove that the relationship itself is genuine and continuing.


Compelling and compassionate circumstances

Home Affairs also states that an applicant who has not been in the de facto relationship for 12 months can provide written information about compelling and compassionate circumstances. Whether this assists depends on the legal criteria and the particular evidence.


Evidence still determines the case

Our Partner Visa Relationship Evidence guide explains the financial, household, social and commitment evidence commonly assessed by Home Affairs.


See also the 820/801 Partner visa guide and the


Official source


This article provides general information only. The 12-month issue depends on the exact visa pathway, legal definition of de facto partner, registration status and facts existing at the relevant time.


Related Top10Migration guides



Top 10 Migration © 2026

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest

Disclaimer: Top 10 Migration Website is a directory of listings and information platform only. The inclusion, order or placement of any migration website, law firm, migration agent or service provider on this website does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, ranking or assessment of quality. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as determining that any listed provider is better or worse than another and or that any company not listed here is not a good firm or agency. 

Any blogs, articles, commentary or other content published on this website are provided for general information purposes only and reflect opinions or general commentary. They do not constitute legal advice, migration advice or professional advice and should not be relied upon as such.

Migration and legal circumstances vary from person to person. Users should make their own enquiries and seek independent legal advice from a suitably qualified legal practitioner or other appropriately authorised professional before making decisions based on any information contained on this website. 

bottom of page