top of page

417 vs 462 Working Holiday Visas 2026: Key Differences Explained

2 days ago
2 min read

Australia's Working Holiday Maker program operates through two visa subclasses: the Working Holiday visa (subclass 417) and the Work and Holiday visa (subclass 462). Both support an extended holiday with incidental work, but eligibility settings differ.


Subclass 417

Subclass 417 is available to passport holders from designated countries and jurisdictions. The standard age range is 18 to 30, with an upper age of 35 for some participating countries.


Subclass 462

Subclass 462 applies to a different group of participating countries and has country-specific eligibility settings. In the 2026–27 program year, first-visa applicants from China, India and Vietnam are subject to a ballot process before they can lodge a first subclass 462 application.


What both visas have in common

Both subclasses generally provide a 12-month working holiday, permit work, limit study or training to 4 months, and are commonly subject to condition 8547 restricting work with one employer to 6 months unless an exemption or permission applies.

See our detailed Condition 8547 guide.


Second and third visas

Both subclasses can support second and third Working Holiday Maker visas for eligible applicants. The specified-work rules differ by subclass and country settings. UK passport holders have special subclass 417 arrangements that remove specified-work requirements for second and third visas for applications made from 1 July 2024.


Official sources


Related Top10Migration guides



Top 10 Migration © 2026

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest

Disclaimer: Top 10 Migration Website is a directory of listings and information platform only. The inclusion, order or placement of any migration website, law firm, migration agent or service provider on this website does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, ranking or assessment of quality. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as determining that any listed provider is better or worse than another and or that any company not listed here is not a good firm or agency. 

Any blogs, articles, commentary or other content published on this website are provided for general information purposes only and reflect opinions or general commentary. They do not constitute legal advice, migration advice or professional advice and should not be relied upon as such.

Migration and legal circumstances vary from person to person. Users should make their own enquiries and seek independent legal advice from a suitably qualified legal practitioner or other appropriately authorised professional before making decisions based on any information contained on this website. 

bottom of page